Bit of a convoluted title, isn’t it?
When I read George Orwell’s Why I write, I was incredibly surprised at how much the article resonated with me. Despite its cynical nature, the four motives of writing he describes are all feelings that I have felt when composing various pieces. It was eerie how much I agreed with his understanding and perception of writing; it felt like he wrote the indescribable feelings I had toward writing (although I would never compare myself to someone as talented as he).
When compared to the piece we read earlier this semester, Why I blog, I feel like George Orwell’s interpretation takes a far more pessimistic and darker stance than the one present in the Why I blog piece. Ergo, it makes it difficult for me to find connections between the two other than the following: writing is an expression of one’s self, regardless of its form. In the end, isn’t that the ultimate truth that is present in writing?
Anyway, I digress. As for my development as a writer, I was initially unsure as how to answer this question because I didn’t do the type of writing I expected. I would have never imagined writing a script and creating a comic as being the two major pieces of writing I am doing for this class; I expected analysis of academic argumentative essays and other stereotypical bland english writing. Thankfully, this was not the case. Writing outside the stereotypical academic essay has undoubtedly helped me develop as a writer, as it forced me to think about the various aspects of writing that I generally ignored. When writing the script and the comic, I had to consider audience, tone, syntax, ethos, logos, and much more. Ultimately, as a writer, I’d consider myself to have begun the process of breaking the narrow minded shell I was trapped in. Cracks are starting to form, and when I am done, I will become a far greater writer than I have ever been before (hopefully that doesn’t come off as too boastful!)