[pika!] Writing About People I Know

I like to write personal essays, and for that reason, most of the essays that I write include people that I know, from quick references to detailed characterizations. I am just now realizing that this could be a problem once some of these essays become accessible to these people via my e-portfolio. My newest fear is that they will someday stumble upon my essays and not like what they find when they start reading.  I don’t explicitly say negative things about my friends and family in my essays, but I worry that they won’t agree with my perspective on our shared experiences. I worry that they will feel as if I have exploited my friends and family by picking apart our/their lives for a good story.

I always write better when I’m open and honest, and I’m best able to do that when analyzing what I know best, my own life. Asking the hard questions about my experiences and writing my way to a resolution has proved to be very rewarding. Not only have I been able to write successful essays, but I have been able to learn a lot about myself and see how much I didn’t know before. In the past, writing personal essays hasn’t been a problem at all.

I never cared about strangers being privy to my insecurities and the secret details of my life. I knew that they read my essays as an outsider with only my perspective to guide them. But the idea of an insider, one of my closest friends or family members, reading one of my essays is terrifying. I shudder as I picture someone reading one of my essays and saying, “That’s not how it happened,” or “I never knew you felt that way about that.”  I don’t know if I’m ready to have my deepest thoughts and feelings revealed to those who think they know me best. Anyone else experiencing similar feelings while putting together their e-portfolio?

Presidential Debate Article

I found this article on the Slate magazine website pretty entertaining just like I found the debate. In this article, Slate awards the best and worst lines of the night, and I found it particularly accurate in the way that it treated the debate as no more than a show. In an awful way, it does seem like no more than a performance, and not a very good one. I understand how this can mobilize voters,  but its unfortunate that a lot of important issues get put on the back burner. It was more about fancy language and persuasion than the issues, which is pretty sad.  Anyone else feel like the debate is no more than a performance?